Search for: "Read v. People" Results 5621 - 5640 of 21,676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2016, 8:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
People don’t watch the news, they don’t read the newspaper and they don’t vote. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:25 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has rejected a district court false arrest judgment in favor of disabled veterans who operate vending carts on New York City sidewalks.The case is Crescenzi v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 6:46 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000  Read More [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
We can see that from the Preamble, which reads, We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 11:45 pm
The response was "no": most people called the court by its old name so that was that. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:19 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Two of the dissenters in Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:04 am
"Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment:  How many people named Parsons can you name? [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:16 am by Kit Walsh
After all, similar fictions were included in the phonebook that the Supreme Court found to lack originality in the leading case defining the limits of copyrightability for compilations, Feist v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
In my judgment, the 2009 and 2010 reviews are to be read as including a reassessment of Ms McDonald’s needs. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am by INFORRM
   Mr Jeremy Reed, counsel for the claimants in both actions, contended that the words “technical or commercial information” in the definition of “intellectual property” should be understood as if it read “protectable technical or commercial information”relying upon the House of Lords decision in Douglas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Crossing to join his four liberal colleagues, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion in yesterday’s Davis v. [read post]