Search for: "State of South Carolina, TheĀ " Results 5621 - 5640 of 14,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 2:01 pm by Michael Kraut
In Charleston, South Carolina, James Bryson Munn struck and hit Kylie Gillette’s SUV in July. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
From a cell in a South Carolina prison, seven inmates filmed a rap video on a cell phone and uploaded it to a popular hip-hop website. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:54 pm by Michael Markarian
Gas Chambers North Carolina’s ban on the use of gas chambers to euthanize homeless dogs and cats in animal shelters took effect in 2015, and the Kansas legislature mandated that regulations banning the use of gas chambers be promulgated. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:32 am by David Oxenford
With Lowest Unit Charge windows either open or to open this month in Iowa and New Hampshire, and windows opening in South Carolina and Nevada in the first week in January, stations need to be paying attention to their political obligations. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:18 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Three state bar associations (California, Delaware, and South Dakota) provide no free research benefit to their members. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Radley Balko] South Carolina $124 million penalty against Risperdal maker should be recognized as violating Excessive Fines clause [Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer, Cato] “Supreme Court will review state laws making it a crime to refuse blood-alcohol tests” [ABA Journal, Reason] Helpless against the administrative state: revisiting SCOTUS’s awful 1944 Yakus case [James Conde and Michael Greve, SSRN via Michael Greve, Law and Liberty] … [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:46 am by David Post
It’s not just the Donald Trumps of the world.** **In a recent speech in South Carolina, Trump said: “We’re losing a lot of people because of the Internet. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:00 am by Sarah Andropoulos
A 2012 North Carolina State Bar advisory opinion is much more explicit about its reasons for reaching a similar conclusion. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:00 am by Sarah Andropoulos
A 2012 North Carolina State Bar advisory opinion is much more explicit about its reasons for reaching a similar conclusion. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
Louis (staff)Mississippi State UniversityGrand Valley State UniversityDarton State CollegeMidwestern UniversityNorth Carolina State University (faculty)Norwegian School of Economics8. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Steve Lubet
Shields Green was an escaped slave from South Carolina who had been introduced to Brown by Frederick Douglass. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 10:48 am by ALDF
There are currently six states that exercise no oversight of or restrictions on private ownership of potentially dangerous animals such as tigers, bears, and apes: Nevada, Wisconsin, North Carolina, South Carolina, Alabama, and Indiana. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:01 am by Kit Case
For example, when both Tennessee and South Carolina closed their 2015 legislative sessions, each had pending one or more opt out bills that state legislators indicate will be resubmitted early in 2016 for debate and consideration. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:37 pm by CJLF Staff
  A South Carolina deputy, Shane Reece, says that he gets more attention while on patrol than he used to; whether the attention is positive or negative, "Both sides are more vocal. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
The injured or unhealthy worker should not be concerned with who's going to pay for what - if the care is delivered quickly, timely, effectively - the vast majority of care recipients are going to be just fine with that.Opt out has been the brunt of criticism the past couple of years with all sorts of legal challenges in Oklahoma, all sorts of anti-opt out lobbying in Tennessee and South Carolina, and public media reports that the promises of injured worker care are illusory.I… [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
South Carolina 15-600 Issue: (1) Whether a state violates the First Amendment by penalizing a defendant for the content of its speech without requiring proof that the speech contains a knowing or reckless falsehood; (2) whether the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempts a state enforcement action that serves no compensatory purpose and instead simply seeks to penalize a pharmaceutical company for actions that are comprehensively regulated and overseen… [read post]