Search for: "State of Vermont"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 7,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 5:16 am
In August, 2007, two data mining companies filed a lawsuit against the State of Vermont in federal district court. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:14 pm
Currently there are only a few states that allow for same-sex marriages including Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont plus the Washington DC, as well as other states that recognize same-sex marriage which include New York, Rhode Island and Maryland. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:43 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:25 pm
Vermont argued that it had enacted the Prescription Confidentiality Law (Vt. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:41 pm
The Court held that the first interest was not justified because Vermont “has conditioned privacy on acceptance of a content-based rule that is not drawn to serve the State’s asserted interest. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
Now why did Vermont doctors petition the state to limit access to prescriber records? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm
The Restriction Is Not Content-Neutral; It’s Not Even Viewpoint-Neutral Vermont’s legislative findings made no effort to hide the fact that the state intended to manipulate the messages that doctors heard. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
Sorrell involves a Vermont statute regulating marketing of drugs by pharmaceutical manufacturers. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
United States, 527 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
This the state cannot do. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:55 pm
" And James Vicini of Reuters reports that "Supreme Court strikes down state drug data-mining law. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:27 pm
IMS Health, striking, on free speech grounds, a 2007 Vermont law that that bans the practice of data mining unless a physician specifically gives his or her permission to use the information. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
If Vermont’s statute provided that prescriber-identifying information could not be sold or disclosed except in narrow circumstances then the State might have a stronger position. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
“Vermont’s law thus has the effect of preventing detailers – and only detailers – from communicating with physicians in an effective and informative manner. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
If prescriber-identifying information were available for use by detailers, the State contends, then detailing would be effective in promoting brand-name drugs that are more expensive and less safe than generic alternatives....While Vermont’s stated policy goals may be proper, §4631(d) does not advance them in a permissible way.... [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
The state legislature had passed the law in 2007... [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
This the State cannot do. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:40 pm
States like Vermont must be able to protect the privacy of sensitive information exchanged between a doctor and patient. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
BELOW THE FOLD IS TEXT VERSION OF DATABASE OF DEBT COLLECTORS __________________________________________________________________________________ 1ST CREDIT OF AMERICA LLC 300 N ELIZABETH ST STE 220-B CHICAGO, IL 60607 6464 INVESTMENTS LLC 1625 S IRIS WY LAKEWOOD, CO 80232-6347 A COMPLETE FINANCIAL INC 2016 OGDEN ST DENVER, CO 80205 AAA COLLECTORS INC DBA TRIPLE CHECK INC 2950 N ACADEMY BLVD UNIT 201 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80917 Aargon Agency Inc 3160 S Valley VW STE 206 Las… [read post]
