Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 22,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2022, 2:50 pm
The complaint (full text) in Sobel v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
Specifically, in Emerson Electric Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:52 am
This case fails as well.The case is Balentine v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:05 am
In Milford Christian Church v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 10:30 pm
We missed this one in 2019, when Arvind Elangovan (Wright State University) published Norms and Politics: Sir Benegal Narsing Rau and the Making of the Indian Constitution, 1935-50 with Oxford University Press. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Hearing officer's applying an incorrect standard in making his or her determination requires the remanding of the matter for a new hearingMcGowan v New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement Sys., 2017 NY Slip Op 01751, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJames K. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
In Church of the Holy Spirit of Wayland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:33 am
Here is one:U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in New Doe Child #1 v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In CBM Ministries of South Central Pennsylvania, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:07 am
In Fifield v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
In Koe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In Schneider v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 4:05 am
In Barnett v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:41 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
The Appellate Division, noting that to prevail PEF bore the burden of demonstrating that the Commission "erred in its job classification determinations," said that decisions of the Commission are "subject to limited judicial review and will not be disturbed absent a showing that [they were] wholly arbitrary or without a rational basis", citing Cove v Sise, 71 NY2d 910. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:38 am
Grandalski v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
The Appellate Division, noting that to prevail PEF bore the burden of demonstrating that the Commission "erred in its job classification determinations," said that decisions of the Commission are "subject to limited judicial review and will not be disturbed absent a showing that [they were] wholly arbitrary or without a rational basis", citing Cove v Sise, 71 NY2d 910. [read post]
