Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 5621 - 5640 of 16,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am by Ben Vernia
Judge Polster reviewed the long history of qui tam actions in the United States, and noted that the Supreme Court, in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm by Josh Blackman
Generally, the only route of appeal from a state court of last resort is to the United States Supreme Court through certiorari. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  Since colonial times, anti-miscegenation laws had existed in British North America and, after the Revolutionary War, in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
The United States Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Christopher v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Ghanaian man comes to the United States on an F-1 visa, which allows him to stay in the country as long as he's enrolled in an approved educational institution. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:34 am by Ronald Mann
Robbins (1997), in which the Court deferred to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation, or was prohibited by the intervening decision in United States v Mead Corporation (2001). [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:29 am
Douglas Carlson submits a FOIA request that wants to know the addresses and hours and final collection times for all of the post offices in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:30 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Judge Noonan dissented and Judge Murguia dissented in part (Pauluk v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 11:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
United States, a 2018 Supreme Court case holding that "the mere fact that a driver in lawful possession or control of a rental car is not listed on the rental agreement will not defeat his or her otherwise reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]