Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 11,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 6:48 am
The application was dismissed on appeal.Read the Alberta Court of Appeal’s decisionDec. 4 – Federal – Canada v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:17 am
(See Nelson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
FMC Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In a recent case called Colley v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am
Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog, while I did the same in Plain English. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:58 am
VOLVO v LOVOL might be a case to look at more closely, though, since it raises some interesting points as to what Article 8(5) and/or conceptual similarity is meant to protect. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am
These arguments were rejected by Vos J who stated that the Prince should not receive special treatment in English litigation, and the order stood. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
The Catt case is one of just three that have gone before the English courts arising from the use of police forward intelligence teams. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
The Catt case is one of just three that have gone before the English courts arising from the use of police forward intelligence teams. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 10:59 pm
Huawei; Invista Sarl v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
In Rahmatullah v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:03 pm
Arguing for a Pennsylvania man in the case of Elonis v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 8:15 pm
Matthew Blackburn of Locke Lord, and Keith McWha of McCarter & English will address recent post-Therasense Federal Circuit decisions relating to inequitable conduct, including the Federal Circuit's decisions in American Calcar v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 1:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 11:34 am
The four chapters that comprise Part V of this tome are dedicated to IP, and the pieces on Korea's "transmit rather than create" concept and the prospects of a Thai adoption of the Bayh-Dole Act are well worth a read.Bibliographic data: Publication date: December 2014. xii + 378 pp. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 6:03 am
In Harding v Wealands [2006] 2 AC 1, the House of Lords held that procedural issues included issues in relation to the assessment of damages whilst the question of recoverability was an issue of substance. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm
Lennox Lewis v Don King, [2004] EWCA Civ1329 (House of Lords, Supreme Court of Judicature). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to my Plain English preview of Elonis v. [read post]
