Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 5641 - 5660
of 41,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2007, 1:50 pm
Arthur Kelsey of the Virginia Court of Appeals is one of my favorites, because he has written so many interesting articles, such as these available online:Virginia's answer to Daubert's question behind the questionAppellate Review and Stare DecisisPROCEDURAL DEFAULTS IN VIRGINIA TRIAL COURTS: The Adversarial Model & The Imperative of NeutralityLegal Focus/Civil Litigation: Law and Equity in Virginiaand gave this speechLaw & Politics: The Imperative of Judicial… [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:10 am
Audio gear in general was a lot more interesting back then. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
This ALD article was interesting. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:51 am
So let her tell us what Case Câ€â [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:53 am
As the case of YL v Birmingham has been the subject of some comment on Nearly Legal I thought that readers may be interested to know that the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Commencement No. 4) Order 2008 SI 2008/2994 has brought s. 145 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 into force. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:29 am
Some interesting links from that page include the following:The VA website for Women's HealthcareMilitary Sexual Trauma websiteCenter for Women Veterans Fact Sheet2011 National Training Summit on Women's VeteransFrequently Asked Questions about the Center for Women's VeteransCopyright (c) 2011 by John V. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
Swirsky, published a Management Memo post that will be of interest to many of our readers: “First Challenge to NLRB’s New Election Rules Dismissed –Rules Held Constitutional. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
(discussed on the Forum here) by John C. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:04 am
§ 202(c)(1). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:37 pm
Swirsky, published a Management Memo post that will be of interest to many of our readers: “First Challenge to NLRB’s New Election Rules Dismissed –Rules Held Constitutional. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 7:50 am
Obviously, they are not dispositive here, but there can be some interesting arguments or points come from them, which is why I bring you R v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
This year, we've seen some interesting law and motion disputes over amending pleadings to include PAGA claims, and the timing that affects those pleadings and amendments. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
(discussed on the Forum here) by John C. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservations Act (ANILCA) that had the effect of subjecting the use of hovercrafts on the Nation River in Alaska to criminal enforcement. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:12 am
The National MS Society is reporting a study on its research page that may of interest to those with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:51 am
§ 3582(c)(2). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 8:21 pm
It pays for itself One GC says a magic circle firm is great but I avoid at all cost reflects a zero sum Overcome zero sum with technology and communication Interests of firm and client be rationalized Agree on high stakes matters and what is commodity work Sets forth ways to align interests. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
As with mortgage loans, I would think that real estate-related limited partnership interests would be considered an asset that qualified under the 3(c)5 exemption as “…(C) purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
A 2014 paper by Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page has a neat chart showing the effects on the probability of a policy’s being adopted changes as support for it rises among (a) average citizens, (b) economic elites, and (c) organized interest groups.For (a), the general public, the line is flat – rising public support for a proposal from 0 towards 100% has almost no effect whatsoever on the likelihood of adoption. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:45 pm
Subdivisions 3(a), (b) and (c) provide for a hearing and the nature of the dispositions to be made at the conclusion thereof. [read post]
