Search for: "President v. State"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 21,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
Collectively, these ten states are home to over 80 million people and will wield 129 of the 270 electoral votes necessary to win the presidency. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:59 am
He stated that the Constitution clearly intended for Congress, and not the President, to have to power to suspend the writ during emergencies. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
* The decision, City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:16 pm
” A later, direct challenge to Title VII – in Corp. of the Presiding Bishop v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:00 am
This was an issue in Parker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:49 am
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
In Janus v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but only… [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:30 pm
Ron Adkins, American’s President, and CEO, informed ARC’s owner, Charles McCormick, that the audit was taking longer than expected and the overall count was shorter than expected. [read post]
10 May 2017, 5:26 am
Consider Justice Antonin Scalia's words in dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:18 am
In a 1999 roundtable discussion, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, suggested that United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:20 pm
And it appoints the presiding judge and two of the five hearing judges of the State Bar Court. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:49 am
I have the absolute right to criticize the president of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am
As Dahlia noted a couple of weeks ago , Chief Justice Roberts used his dissent in Sprint v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am
As Dahlia noted a couple of weeks ago, Chief Justice Roberts used his dissent in Sprint v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 6:30 am
DeStefano v. [read post]
