Search for: "State v. E. F."
Results 5641 - 5660
of 8,849
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 10:05 am
TBP v. promisor promisee v. promisor TBP v. promise ? [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:05 am
V. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:56 am
In Miller v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:56 am
In Miller v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:31 pm
" The previous case cited -- United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:05 pm
— United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated AEDPA § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had… [read post]
28 May 2012, 7:07 am
Slanina, 283 F.3d 670 (U.S. [read post]
27 May 2012, 12:49 pm
First Nat’l State Bank of N.J., 87 N.J. 163, 175-76 (1981) (quoting Gellert v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
James F. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
James F. [read post]
25 May 2012, 11:32 am
The Research Foundation of State University of New York v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently weighed in on the scope of the United States Supreme Court’s influential opinion in Stern v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:00 am
Laurel County, 636 F.3d 218 (6th Cir. 2011).In the second Sixth Circuit case, Davis v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:00 am
Mark F. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:39 am
Cir. 2000) (“the Board’s decision must be justified within the four corners of th[e] record”). (...)Life Technologies, Inc v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:18 am
” Purdham, 637 F.3d at 428 (quoting Cleveland v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:13 am
Matter of Kean v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Dist., 570 F.3d 1210, 2009.) [read post]
