Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 28,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 1:28 pm
Barr, et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court today resolved United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
Rather, I attempt to shed light on a few important points that—so far—have not received enough attention, in particular against the background of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:51 am
On December 19, she received a notice stating that the board would address her employment status during a closed meeting on December 21. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:26 am
On Wednesday May 6, 2020 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Barr v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
His decision followed the recommendation of Congress’s attending physician, Brian Monahan, who warned against recalling members of Congress in light of worsening numbers of coronavirus infections in Washington, D.C. [read post]
6 May 2020, 8:45 am
In dismissing the lawsuit and denying the union’s motion for emergency relief as moot, the court urged the parties to pursue arbitration swiftly if their continued good-faith efforts to reach an amicable resolution failed since “[l]ives may hang in the balance, and the union nurses deserve as much” (New York State Nurses Association v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 5:02 am
From Duggar v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:47 pm
However, in two 2019 rulings – the Marchand v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:59 pm
v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:54 am
The Case: Ridley v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:12 am
To discuss this in this way is heresy, I realize, but please indulge this heretic a little further before you light a fire under my stake. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:31 am
Fund v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:00 am
In Mohamed v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am
The Bank is domiciled in The Netherlands and sought to argue that, in light of the Regulation, proceedings ought to have been brought there. [read post]
[Guest Post] 21 and illegal in all states? The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegal
5 May 2020, 1:20 am
It remains to be seen how national legislators in Germany or other EU states will pursue a pastiche exception. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:20 am
State v. [read post]
