Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 23,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
In finding my participation in the National Association of Scholars’ conference on Fixing Science, “worrying” and “concerning,” John Mashey takes his cues from the former OSHA Administrator, David Michaels. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:37 pm
The state argued the court should have granted a new trial instead. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 11:32 am
S.C. hired an attorney and filed an administrative complaint. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 8:51 am
He said the Nixon precedent does not apply because challenges to the congressional subpoenas of officials in the Nixon administration were litigated in the courts, whereas the subpoenas of Trump administration officials were dealt with by the legislature. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:39 am
“The real problem here is the increasingly common practice of trial courts ordering relief that transcends the cases before them. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:14 am
The point is that there will never be a trial. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:41 am
Courts require the parties to engage in discovery of their claims and defenses, and then courts address dispositive motions to dismiss either the claims or the defenses. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
App. 455 (2008) (unpublished) (“Although the trial court had the discretion to appoint an interpreter, Defendant has failed to show the trial court abused its discretion by failing to appoint one, especially given that Defendant failed to request an interpreter and was able to answer intelligibly when directly questioned by the trial court. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
” In that case, the trial court rejected this interpretation of the statute. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
This past Friday, Feb. 7, just days after his acquittal in the Senate impeachment trial, President Trump launched what some fear may become a campaign of reprisal against those federal employees who testified against him in the House’s impeachment proceedings. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Of the 28 OLC opinions cited in the trial memorandum, eight were issued by the Trump administration, and 20 were issued by prior administrations. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s inference from the letter that there was a “substantial unanimity of action” among the letter’s writer and its addressees. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm
The peanut paste and peanut butter PCA was producing was not fit for human consumption, according to the Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:24 pm
It is reported that the case proceeded to trial, and the salient issue presented to the jury was whether the defendants were medically negligent in the administration of the epidural and post-epidural care. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 12:28 pm
Thus, if a trial court enters an order suppressing evidence that bars the prosecutor from establishing probable cause that a crime occurred, the only proper course of action is for the prosecutor to dismiss the charge. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 10:58 am
The judges were Harold Baer and Thomas Griesa, both cases were at the trial court level, and both cases both involved my favorite clause, pari passu. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni suggests that the Trump administration’s arguments during the impeachment trial as well as in briefs filed last week in two cases regarding subpoenas for the president’s tax returns mesh with the administration’s strategy of “actively, and so far pretty successfully, promoting an expansive view of the president’s powers in every branch of government. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
For the court to play its supervisory role, Afghanistan contended that the court must have the flexibility to apply the “interests of justice” analysis to difficult cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 12:40 pm
In January, the Indian Supreme Court issued an order to the central government and to the administration of the states of Jammu and Kashmir to begin an immediate review of restrictions on movement and landline, mobile phone, and internet access in those states. [read post]
