Search for: "The Examiner"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 161,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 2:25 pm
In conclusion, the Examiner is wrong on the law and wrong to torture the prior art references by arbitrarily sketching lines that are defined only by the Examiner. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:41 pm
This is a question many trademark applicants struggle with once they receive a final refusal from an Examining Attorney. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
This appeal is against the decision of the Examining Division (ED) to refuse the patent application. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 9:17 pm
The program will examine substantive obviousness issues since KSR and the continuing disputes in the lower courts, and will further examine the prohibition... [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:38 pm
Once substantive examination has begun, if the examiner finds that the application has more than one object, the applicant... [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:39 am
Naira Simmons has published a nice short article titled: Putting Yourself in the Shoes of a Patent Examiner: Overview of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Examiner Production (Count) System, 17. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 12:08 am
According to the USPTO press release (link below), "[c]ooperation on PCT search and examination work is part of the USPTO's ongoing efforts to improve examination efficiency and quality, while reducing the growing backlog of U.S. national patent applications waiting to be examined," and that "[the] USPTO found that the quality and accuracy of the work done by IP Australia during phase one warrants extending the project and increasing the number of… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:08 pm
Richard Brookhiser examines a new biography of the writer:[H]e was a restless man. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
Examining Federal Administration of the Safe Drinking Water Act in Flint, MI – House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing witnesses & testimony of Former Region 5 Administrator; Former MI Emergency Manager; Former Fling Mayor & Virginia Polytechnic Institute Professor(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 8:54 am
Did I examine his head well enough? [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:02 am
My two cents: Don't bother appealing if the Examiner has pointed to particular portions of the provisional and you haven't yet reviewed those portions to determine whether the Examiner is right. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:06 am
In their examinations of furnishers, the CFPB examiners found “CMS weaknesses and numerous violations of the FCRA and Regulation V that required corrective action by furnisher(s). [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 12:00 pm
The new examiner count-system addresses this problem by reducing the credit (counts) that examiners receive for examining RCE filings and increasing the credit for initial office actions. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:22 am
The issue related to a new ground of rejection made by the BPAI following an invalidity finding in a re-examination proceeding:The principal issue here is whether the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”), in affirming an examiner’s ruling on reexamination that a patent was invalid as obvious, relied on a new ground of rejection, i.e., a rejection that the examiner had not explicitly made.The crux was that the Board and the Examiner… [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 1:41 pm
The Report replaced two of FINRA’s prior publications – FINRA’s Examination Findings and Observations Report and FINRA’s Risk Monitoring and Examination Priorities Letter. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 pm
So today I get a call on a case (not mine), a forensic examiner. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 1:41 pm
The Report replaced two of FINRA’s prior publications – FINRA’s Examination Findings and Observations Report and FINRA’s Risk Monitoring and Examination Priorities Letter. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
To some degree, the cases beg the question of what is “non-destructive” as opposed to “destructive” product testing/examination. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:04 am
Related posts: Patent Office Proposes Changes to Examiner Quota SystemDavid Kappos, the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, unveiled yesterday a series of proposals to bring significant change to the examiner “count system†â€" the methodology for determining the time a patent examiner has to complete a patent examination and how much credit is given for each stage of an examination.… [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 8:18 am
The Examination Guidelines can be found at the USPTO. [read post]
