Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 5641 - 5660 of 55,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
A data broker has been selling raw location data about individual people to federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, EFF has learned. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:39 pm by Josh Blackman
The American Association of Law Schools held the annual meeting at the Midtown Hilton. [read post]
  Throughout the filing, the department takes pains to set out evidence that could speak to the intent of Trump and the people around him—beginning with its description of the referral from the National Archives. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:20 am by Daniel Shaviro
Seligman, the question that would interest me starting out is why on earth did he write that crazy American Economic Review piece / amicus brief in Eisner v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:43 am by Ezra Rosser
The return of judicial discretion with the United Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:29 am by Chip Merlin
John Morgan was not the first advertising attorney following the 1977 Supreme Court case of Bates v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
  GENERAL ALLEGATIONS According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), 84 people from Ohio (23), Michigan (53), Pennsylvania (2), and Indiana (6), have been infected with the same strain of E. coli O157:H7, with illness onset dates ranging from July 26 through August 8, 2022. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
It's fairly clear that his mental condition results in him violating the law on occasion, sometimes in bizarre ways; e.g., in court, trying to "escape" in situations in which a more rational person would totally know that the effort ain't gonna work. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:27 am by SHG
“We’ve had people actually thank us for it,” he said. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The 73-page complaint (full text) in Christian Healthcare Centers, Inc. v. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]