Search for: "Birth v. Birth"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 7,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiff argued that the baby died from an over-dose of Demerol that was administered to the baby after birth or his mother before birth. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:05 pm
In Millet v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
So, theoretically, the (then-allegedly) 16-year old Nevada girl whom Doss pandered could now come and testify at a federal sentencing hearing, birth certificate in hand. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Cir. 1996)(Depo-Provera, birth defects) Miller v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:39 am
The appeal was dismissed.M v F & Others, an appeal of a mother against a judgment refusing her a wide ranging series of declarations, the object of which was to deny the father all knowledge of the birth and subsequent development of his legitimate child. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:33 pm
Part V discusses China's intercountry adoption program, analyzing the causes of the statistical changes in intercountry adoptions, including the significant declines from 2004 through 2010. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:36 am
Borger v Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse (Case C-516/09); [2011] WLR (D) 89 “The status of an ‘employed person’, within the meaning of article 1(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, as amended , applied to a person during a six-month period of extended unpaid leave following the birth of a child, provided that, during that period, that person was covered, even if only in respect of a single risk, on a compulsory or optional basis, by a general or special social… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:07 pm
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered “serious” if the investigator or sponsor believes any of the following outcomes may occur: “death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
In the 1989 decision in Webster v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:36 pm
This issue before the court was one of first impression in the state and was decided upon in Iaccino v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:33 am
Jawara v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:23 am
Accordingly, following Lancashire County Council & Anor v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Waller v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:36 pm
Gary Blake, M.D. provided a § 2-622 report and testified as one of the plaintiff’s experts for a medical negligence case brought by John and Elisa Iaccino against two doctors and a hospital for brain damage suffered by their son, Jonathan for oxygen deprivation during birth. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:46 am
This just in: In Ironworkers Local 68 & Participating Employers Health & Welfare Funds v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:21 am
Cook and State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
(See, Fajujonu v Minister for Justice [1990] 2 IR 151). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:07 pm
On January 5, 2011, the Connecticut Supreme Court released its opinion in Raftopol v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
