Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 13,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2006, 6:56 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed (See MedImmune Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
A reviewing court must defer to the administrative fact finder's assessment of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses2. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:35 am
By Dennis Crouch In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 12:32 pm
In Nippon Shinyaku v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:30 am
The contractor, which admitted that it received the notice, claims it was mishandled by an administrative assistant and was never delivered to a corporate officer or the company’s legal counsel. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:58 pm
In Brown and Gay Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
More recently, in Freytag v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:49 am
Yesterday the Court stayed most of the district court's injunction in Labrador v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 2:07 pm
Same-sex marriage was legalized nationwide a few months after James’ death, and Michael brought a class action lawsuit in federal court against the Social Security Administration. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
In this toxic tort action, the Colorado Supreme Court in In Re Jordan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 3:35 pm
Circuit decision cited the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:28 am
” Lewis v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:28 am
” Lewis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:15 pm
In a related family separation case, M.M.M. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:36 am
., v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
" In addition, the Gair Firm's retainer statement, dated March 3, 2006, filed with the Office of Court Administration states that "[a]ny fees awarded to the out-going Attorneys, Alpert & Kaufman, will be the sole responsibility of the plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
" In addition, the Gair Firm's retainer statement, dated March 3, 2006, filed with the Office of Court Administration states that "[a]ny fees awarded to the out-going Attorneys, Alpert & Kaufman, will be the sole responsibility of the plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
Supreme Court on Monday abruptly discharged New Orleans lawyer Gregory Grimsalas special master in Texas v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
” Judge Kornreich said that “The standard in an Article 78 proceeding, the court’s role is to determine whether the challenged administrative action had a rational basis or whether it was an arbitrary and capricious action [and] the administrative action must be upheld unless it ‘shocks the judicial conscience and, therefore, constitutes an abuse of discretion as a law. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
In Jander v. [read post]
