Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 29,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2007, 12:45 pm
GMC, 271 F.3d 583, 591 (4th Cir. 2001). [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
Therefore, the defendants had no qualified immunity. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
Scully, 108 F. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 490 F. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:55 am
Co., 561 F.3d 439, 443 (6th Cir.2009) (It is impermissible to consider each and every exposure to asbestos to be a substantial factor causing the disease. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 4:55 pm
Case Number: 42-1981-CF-000170-AXXX-XXFile Date: 02/04/1981Judge: CARVEN D ANGEL DEFENDANT :LIGHTBOURN IAN (DOB: 1959)Attorney: PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE Charges Date Citation Count Charge Level Degree Disposition 04/25/1981 1 MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE F CAPITAL ADJUDICATED GUILTY Dockets Date Event Count Party Amount 07/16/2007 HEARING SET LIGHTBOURN IAN $0.00 Calendar Posting on 06/19/2007 06/19/2007 COURT MINUTES LIGHTBOURN IAN… [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:09 pm
Litig., 889 F. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:17 am
Murphy Oil USA, — F.3d —, 2010 WL 2136658 (5th Cir. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:24 pm
" (557 F.3d at 685) What does matter, however, is whether the district court is considering the issue as a §5K1.1 departure motion, or a request for a variance under § 3553(a). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:11 am
These components included military parts for the Bell AH-1 attack helicopter, the UH-1 Huey attack helicopter, as well as the F-5 and F-4 fighter jets. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
Hardee, 723 F.3d 488 (4th Cir. 2013) (summarizing, in a federal habeas case, that “expert testimony on eyewitness identifications is not automatically admitted; when allowed, its admissibility is generally at the court’s discretion, both under federal and North Carolina law”); State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
Hardee, 723 F.3d 488 (4th Cir. 2013) (summarizing, in a federal habeas case, that “expert testimony on eyewitness identifications is not automatically admitted; when allowed, its admissibility is generally at the court’s discretion, both under federal and North Carolina law”); State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 12:07 pm
Moments later, defendant's vehicle came back and defendant again stared at the complainant. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
Patent No. 7,772,209 Lilly and Princeton ask the court for: (a) A judgment that Defendants have infringed the '932 patent and/or will infringe and/or actively induce infringement of the '932 patent; (b) A judgment ordering that the effective date of any FDA approval for Defendants to make, use, offer for sale, sell, market, distribute, or import Defendants' ANDA Products, or any product the use of which infringes the '932 patent, be not earlier than… [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
Forrester, 512 F.2d 500 (U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
Wales LLC, 993 F. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:51 pm
Litig., 597 F. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 10:37 am
Ass'n, 494 F.3d 788 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
Ass'n, 494 F.3d 788 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 12:11 pm
USA, Inc., 395 F.3d 1364, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
