Search for: "In Re He" Results 5661 - 5680 of 136,475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 am by Ken
Does he realize that though he has absolute immunity for lawless prosecutions, he does not have absolute immunity for seeking a search warrant based on protected expression? [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
He famously stated, ”You’re either part of the problem or part of the solution,’’ a challenge that became a slogan for the era. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 11:02 am
Guy Kawasaki notes the following as some of the things he wished he had learned before he left graduate school: "1. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:24 pm
In re Sunland, Inc., Serial Nos. 77310231 and 77307289 (August 7, 2009) [not precedential].Of course, the two block-letter marks are "virtually identical. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
He was, in fact, "much more aspirational," and he stood for a coherent set of principles — "limited government, you know, smaller government, lower taxes, strong national defense" — that appeared clear to Walker when, as a teenager, he voted for Reagan and that is still memorable today. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:26 pm
They’re records of human creativity that are held in the public trust.'"But nowhere in the piece does he mention the inconvenient fact that the Association of Art Museum Directors in the US is perfectly happy to consider works of art liquid assets and convert them into cash ... just so long as the proceeds are used to buy more art. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division opined that NYCTA determination that Plaintiff would pose an unreasonable risk because "he was convicted of criminal possession of a firearm only two years before seeking re-employment with NYCTA and he sought a role that required unsupervised contact with the public and other employees" was reasonable and unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division opined that NYCTA determination that Plaintiff would pose an unreasonable risk because "he was convicted of criminal possession of a firearm only two years before seeking re-employment with NYCTA and he sought a role that required unsupervised contact with the public and other employees" was reasonable and unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Accord In re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
They're going to have to play the Elizabeth card. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Gonzalo E. Mon
But if you’re a professional eater, the analysis may change. [read post]