Search for: "Line v. People" Results 5661 - 5680 of 13,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2019, 6:50 am
After Rome fell, for instance, Europeans used barter as a substitute for the Roman currency people had gotten used to. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm by Joseph Fishkin
The Supreme Court today took the narrowest and simplest route to upholding an obscure tax provision in Moore v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew Guariglia
Supreme Court decided a landmark case on this subject, Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:45 am by David Post
The statute will — and is designed to — constrain people from communicating with other people in certain specified ways. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Sandy Levinson
 Indeed, the Republicans who control the Maine legislature are apparently resolutely doing what they can to avoid complying with the wishes of the people of Maine to reform their electoral system (just as, incidentally, they refuse to accept the people's verdict, in a referendum, to join Medicaid). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Sally Peat
He quickly calmed our nerves and by the end of the session had us all strutting the room as if we were on stage at the Theatre Royal, bellowing lines from Shakespeare’s Henry V. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am by Eleonora Rosati
Whether in traffic, at the airport or at the cinema, people are exposed to a variety of brand messages every day. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
Reasonableness is that vague, blurry area between the bright line of police authority and unreasonableness. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am by Stephen Bilkis
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:47 pm
  But the seminal case on Double Jeopardy issue preclusion, Ashe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:29 am
The Third Circuit lined up the issue . . . wait a second . . . it's a punt! [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Runyon (Necessary Party; Fishing Rights)Frank’s Landing Indian Community v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:38 am
  There are very good reasons to worry that someone in this situation may be more tempted than usual to cross the line into dishonest or unethical behavior, and good reasons to worry that other people in the company are going to lose faith in her abilities and her judgment. [read post]