Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Por: Víctor Manuel Guízar López INTERNET HAS BECOME A TOOL THAT HAS UNIMAGINABLY REDESIGNED THE MEANS BY WHICH HUMAN BEINGS COMMUNICATE AND HAS TURNED OUT TO BE THE PURE EMBODIMENT OF GLOBALIZATION. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
By Richard Pike, Simon Yeung, Emelyne Peticca The limitations period for cartel damages cases in the United Kingdom has not finished evolving, as evidenced by two recent significant decisions. [read post]
6 May 2025, 4:00 am
Chief Justice Roberts in Seila Law v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm
Just as critics at the time feared, the new doctrine swept across the national landscape, invalidating the districting maps in nearly every jurisdiction in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
Maatman, Jr. and Mark W. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
– IPO consultation (Class 99) Reform of IP taxation – consultation underway (IP finance) The PCC Page no.8: Last chance to make your voice heard – consultation on the proposed limit on recoverable damages in the Patents County Court (PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches Twitter account (Patent Docs) US Patent Reform ‘Patent reform’ still possible in 2010?!? [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode) United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court already removed one such guardrail in Trump v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm
Lucky 13 further claims that Swift had filed about sixty federal trademark applications with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 2:06 am
In NaturaLawn of America it could not be the first of the trademarks because [a]n objective bystander, comparing the domain name with the mark would, on the balance of probabilities, conclude that the domain name is invoking a generalized concept of natural lawns, meaning lawns cultivated and maintained by natural means, whereas the mark is invoking a specific enterprise that had styled itself NATURALAWN OF AMERICA, which is concerned with natural lawns, but is a specific brand and… [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
Anil Kumar Gupta on the cross pollination of innovation and its promotion (Spicy IP) ICANN renders ‘domain tasting’ unpalatable (Spicy IP) United Kingdom Drinks giant Diageo and Sainsbury's have reached agreement in their dispute (IPKat) (IPKat) Patent litigation costs and SMEs a judge speaks (PatLit) (PatLit) United States US General US Industry Campaign: IP needed to address climate change,… [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
So while the USOC has registered TEAM USA for everything from coffee mugs to cowbells, others can arguably use the hashtag #TeamUSA or the phrase “team USA” descriptively when they talk about athletes who represent the United States in the Olympics. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court case, Ridgway v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
United States (relisted [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
United States (relisted after the 9/26 and 10/7 Conferences) Docket: 10-9333 Issue(s): Whether the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:46 pm
United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459 (1994) (holding that an ambiguous reference to counsel does not invoke the right to an attorney); see also United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
United States Patent No. 3,178,242 (filed May 13, 1963) (“Ellis”) discloses a beverage carton with a removable corner and a finger opening(...)So let’s be clear what claim 2 is about. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:24 am
Levenstein was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, for the failure to pay child support (see 18 USC § 228). [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
”[v] This is fundamentally unfair to the collection of tax revenues by the RTA and Cook County because American and United Airlines primarily operate in Cook County. [read post]
