Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 5661 - 5680 of 16,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 8:16 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
So held the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its January 10, 2018 decision in Taha v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:19 pm
ADDED: "[V]ariations on the phrase have been used by politicians and states — including New Jersey, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia — to describe their own pro-business policies for at least two decades. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am by Charles Rothfeld
He will file an amicus brief on behalf of the State and Local Legal Center supporting the respondents in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am by Giesela Ruehl
Yesterday, the ECJ has rendered its decision in Case C-498/16 Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
That development is important not merely for its internal effects but for what it might offer to other states as a model of legitimating constitutionalism (and the construction of constitutional states) that  varies in fundamental respects from the forms and expression of constitutionalism and the construction of constitutional states in the West. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:09 am by Edward T. Kang
The Second Circuit, for instance, held that Rule 9(b) requires fraud complaints to allege facts that lead to a “strong inference” that the defendant has the requisite state of mind even though Rule 9(b) provides that conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged generally, see, e.g., IKB International v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
Overall, this is a harmful trend characterized by excessive State responses. [read post]
The overbreadth doctrine is “strong medicine,” and has a tendency, as Justice Antonin Scalia noted in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:18 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
For Canada, in particular, strengthening legal protection for Internet platforms could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]