Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 5681 - 5700 of 10,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
Wurie, No. 13–212, the United States Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit went the opposite way and suppressed evidence from a warrantless cell phone search incident to arrest.There is no controlling precedent in this circuit. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s mistress could not be prosecuted in federal court under laws prohibiting the use and possession of chemical weapons. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:31 am by Dennis Crouch
This bill expands the public interest to include competitive conditions in the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:37 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States quotes Justice Felix Frankfurter's classic article, Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes, 47 Colum. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
To tolerate imprecision just short of that render­ ing a claim “insolubly ambiguous” would diminish the definiteness requirement’s public-notice function and foster the innovation-discouraging “zone of uncertainty,” United Carbon, 317 U. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:46 am by Wells Bennett
The United States, pursuant to the Federal Government’s constitutionally enumerated power to make treaties, ratified the treaty in 1997. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Historically, the United States was the largest GHG emitter, but it’s not anymore. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:11 am by admin
., non-criminal) “reviewable matters” under the Act include abuse of dominance (or monopolization as it is referred to in the United States under the Sherman Act), civil misleading advertising, refusal to deal, price maintenance and certain types of “vertical” restraints by dominant firms (e.g., exclusive dealing and tied selling). [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Schachtman
United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1239 (8th Cir. 1991), decided before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.) [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:22 am by SHG
  But then it raises the hoary question of how neither the cop, the prosecutor nor the judge who signed off was aware that the law in the United States of America allowed a guy to use the flag to express himself? [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am by Amy Howe
”  Last fall the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am by Greg Mersol
  While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:39 pm
Indeed, some were openly hostile to African Americans, and launched such progressive schemes as the wave of residential segregation laws that swept through the United States in the 1910s. [read post]