Search for: "State v. Selle" Results 5681 - 5700 of 14,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
 Those exceptions are (1) selling the drug after the FDA withdraws it from the market; (2) bribing an FDA official; and (3) committing fraud on the FDA. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Golan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:05 am
And it further held that petitioners failed to show that the State has the "power to sell ceded lands pursuant to the terms of the Admission Act. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
The only European authority on "staple commercial products" cited was a Patents County Court decision in Pavel v Sony Corporation where HHJ Ford stated that a "staple commercial product is a commodity or raw material". [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:25 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Day in Saunders’s medical records stating that he was using cocaine and was financing this habit by “selling his possessions”. [read post]
9 Jun 2025, 1:15 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Sanofi and Regeneron market alirocumab (the active ingredient in Praulent®) whilst Amgen sells the competing product evolocumab (the active ingredient in Repatha®). [read post]
This, they allege, gives cattle producers fewer options when selling their cattle. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 12:33 pm by Neil Cahn
The wife made a pendente lite application to sell the marital residence. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
  But, sure enough, there's actually a decision from our state's highest court, refusing to characterize the sale of outdated merchandise as a "deceptive or misleading" business practice.In Matter of Food Parade, Inc. v. [read post]