Search for: "State v. Word" Results 5681 - 5700 of 40,640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2009, 11:20 am
  It was not controlled by state law. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm by Orin Kerr
For example, minor defects in warrants do not warrant suppression, see United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Justice Thomas would allow states to punish gays and lesbians just for having sex in their own homes. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
In other words, he would be able to keep the case in federal court if he had a viable § 1030 claim. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:23 am
Federal Express Corp., 564 F.3d 507, 516 (1st Cir. 2009) (defining “intimidation” as to put another in fear); State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
In other words, internet service providers are not liable for third-party content. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:16 pm by Derek T. Muller
Husted (2016): application for stay October 25, 2016; denied October 31, 2016Arizona Secretary of State’s Office v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:51 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In Alito’s words, “the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives”. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm by Matt Sundquist
CNN's Bill Mears reports that the case could affect state laws in the twenty-two states that have laws similar to the federal restrictions overruled today. [read post]