Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,third Circuit" Results 5681 - 5700 of 6,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am by Jonathan H. Adler
At issue was the timing and amount of notice the federal government must give non-citizen, non-permanent residents to trigger the stop time rule, which can affect whether such individuals are allowed to remain in the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:38 am by Hans von Spakovsky
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Stefanie Levine
Affirming the California District Court, the Federal Circuit ruled that the first agreement Holodniy signed was not a present assignment of rights, and thus Roche was an owner of the invention in the disputed patents. [5] Stanford appealed to the Supreme Court and a writ or certiorari was granted on November 1, 2010. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Stefanie Levine
Affirming the California District Court, the Federal Circuit ruled that the first agreement Holodniy signed was not a present assignment of rights, and thus Roche was an owner of the invention in the disputed patents. [5] Stanford appealed to the Supreme Court and a writ or certiorari was granted on November 1, 2010. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Amy Howe
  Thomas began by noting that Genesis “comes to us from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Ever since the FDA decided that discretion was the better part of valor – or read the handwriting on the wall – and decided not to appeal United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm by Florian Mueller
The South Korean law theoretically requires Apple and Google to do what Epic Games has so far failed to win in court (except in the eyes of a journalist who may never stop reiterating clearly erroneous legal interpretations) and the odds tend to be against Epic's appeal). [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:17 am by Gene Quinn
With the exception of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, these agreements have almost universally been found to be legal and not to implicate any form of antitrust violation. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:17 am by Gene Quinn
With the exception of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, these agreements have almost universally been found to be legal and not to implicate any form of antitrust violation. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-983, also obtained its second relist. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
  In Milward, Justice Stevens’ mischaracterization of WOE and scientific method was adopted as the legal standard for expert witness testimony by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals, for the First Circuit. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by Susan Brenner
An Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) told him to proceed with drafting the affidavit. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:31 am by Amul Kalia
    The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which recently held that the CFAA does not apply to violations of employer-imposed use restrictions, stated that “[w]hile the Government might promise that it would not prosecute an individual [for violating its employers terms of use], we are not at liberty to take prosecutors at their word in such matters. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:04 am by Steve Hall
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans, which has the same reputation. [read post]