Search for: "Williams v. State" Results 5681 - 5700 of 12,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 10:46 am by David Kemp
After assessing the legislative history of the Sixth Amendment and the purpose of the jury, the Court in Williams v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
"And at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr has a post titled "Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
On 20 to 23 February 2023 Heather Williams J heard the trial in the case of Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on the same day there was a statement in open court in the case of Begum Liza Shahinur v BBC before Heather Williams J. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:35 pm by Steven G. Pearl
William Bielby, a sociologist, to interpret and explain the facts that suggest that Wal-Mart has and promotes a strong corporate culture — a culture that may include gender stereotyping. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Stewart at The National Law Review.Giving credence to the adage that honesty is the best policy, a panel from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:57 am by Florian Mueller
Google Android-Java copyright appeal hearing held by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have independently of each other shared (via Twitter) their observations that last year's ruling by District Judge William Alsup will likely be reversed. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Donahue has posted to SSRN her history-laden amicus curiae brief in FBI v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:53 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
The missing documents -- some of which have never resurfaced -- included a 1952 letter from future Chief Justice William Rehnquist, then a law clerk for Justice Robert Jackson, allegedly expressing disappointment with the Court's decision to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm by David Markus
On this record, holding that the ban is constitutional as applied to Kanter does not “put[] the government through its paces,” see Williams, 616 F.3d at 692, but instead treats the Second Amendment as a “second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,” McDonald v. [read post]