Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 7,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 10:55 am
Appleseed Executive Director Walter Smith Jr. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 10:03 am
Lamar Smith (R-Texas) now proposes a grant of unlimited power to the executive branch to revoke visas without any oversight by the judicial branch. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:10 am
If passed as presently proposed, the bill would effect many changes in existing U.S. patent law, of which three are most notable: As between applicants claiming the same invention, the bill would entitle the applicant that filed its application first to a patent on that invention. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:56 am
(Patent Docs) Avendia (Rosiglitazone maleate) – Israel: Is Smith Kline Beecham’s patent for Rosiglitazone Maleate invalidated by an earlier patent claiming Rosiglitazone and its salts? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm
Smith, there’s no constitutional problem with applying generally applicable animal cruelty bans to religious behavior.Still, about half the states do generally provide that religious objectors are entitled to exemptions from generally applicable laws, unless denying the exemption is necessary to serve a “compelling government interest. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
Smith, 10-1115. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:59 am
Chairman Smith’s Amendment First, in a bout of extreme modesty, he proposes to change the name of the bill yet again, to the “Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:09 am
Apart from making up the fee diversion money, the taxpayer (or patent applicant) is being asked to underwrite a previously non-existent post-grant review mechanism. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:45 pm
trademark (insidemovies.ew.com) Follow Up of the Day: Disney Withdraws SEAL Team 6 Trademark Applications (thedailywh.at) UPDATE: Disney Withdraws Application To Trademark “Seal Team 6? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:07 am
Smith v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:35 am
The Parole Division of TDCJ, and the Board have been too zealous in their application of Condition X, and have ignored good legal advice from years ago about how this would eventually turn out. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:05 am
Smith and Jay Wexler; response by Douglas Laycock. 89 Texas Law Review 901-966 (2011).Signs of the Times: The First Amendment and Religious Symbolism. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:53 am
And some legal texts are vague--they use concepts that have indefinite application to particular cases. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
Justice Smith, for the majority, in Sam v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:19 am
In a letter to Lamar Smith on June 6, 2011, Congressman Rogers and Congressman Ryan, both committee chairman, ask that section 22 be deleted, or otherwise modified. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm
Lamar Smith (Chairman of the Judiciary) insisting on maintaining the power of these two committees to control the Patent Office’s money received as user fees. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
However, this earlier software, S4, had been destroyed ten years prior to the case so the USPTO Patent Examiners never had the opportunity to examine the i4i’s patent application in light of this alleged prior art. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
"Congress specified the applicable standard of proof in 1952 when it codified the common-law presumption of patent validity," Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
"Congress specified the applicable standard of proof in 1952 when it codified the common-law presumption of patent validity," Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
"Congress specified the applicable standard of proof in 1952 when it codified the common-law presumption of patent validity," Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the Court. [read post]
