Search for: "DOE v. Smith" Results 5701 - 5720 of 6,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The recent case of Regina v Smith & Others (read Maria Roche’s post here) involved an examination of the terms of a Sexual Offences Prevention Order under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:00 pm by admin
In its 1990 opinion Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm by admin
In 1968, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:42 am by Adam Wagner
The recent case of Regina v Smith & Others (read Maria Roche’s post here) involved an examination of the terms of a Sexual Offences Prevention Order under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:34 am
  Twenty years ago, in State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
We will further consider your failure to inform you’re assured of the within offer to settle as evidence of bad faith under the recent case of Smith, et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Sadie Basila
Magid has been a partner at Dorsey & Whitney for over 35 years, where he has defended multiple cases involving product liability and recyclability claims, such as Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Jessie Smith previously analyzed this aspect of Santa’s misconduct here, citing State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Since the Justices’ ruling in 2008 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:04 pm
  In other words, does fair use really disappear whenever there is a market that licenses reproductions? [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 7:51 am by Camilla Hrdy
" Citing to both the trade secret statutes and to case law, we argue that, just as under the trademark statute a cessation of use without intent to resume ends a trademark right, so too does ceasing to derive independent economic value end a trade secret right. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Decision 14,373Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the location of that thin line that separates lawful constructive criticism of an individual’s performance by a supervisor and supervisory actions addressing an individual’s performance that are disciplinary in nature.As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a counseling memorandum that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file constitutes a lawful… [read post]