Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 5701 - 5720 of 108,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2020, 11:38 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
  Testimony, however, does not necessarily reflect the legislature’s intent. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
(2) If Blakely is a new rule, does its requirement that facts resulting in an enhanced statutory maximum be proved beyond a reasonable doubt apply retroactively?] [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:35 am
When the record does not indicate when petitioner actually received the determination, the date of receipt is calculated by affording the usual five days for mailing, excluding Sundays and holidays.3. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:41 am by Matthew Kolken
§ 1158(d)(6)(2006), can be made in the absence of a final decision on the merits of the asylum application. (2) Withdrawal of an alien’s asylum application after the required warnings and safeguards have been provided does not preclude a finding that the application is frivolous. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
Circuit Court of Appeals rules that hearsay testimony is admissible to support the issuance of a preliminary injunctionMullins v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:48 pm
., does not violate the Constitution and may stay where it is. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:59 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The trial court affirmed the award and this appeal by Serna ensued. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Kirby Over the past week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (“Second Circuit”) has issued two decisions in which it affirmatively held that: (i) a plaintiff cannot use the “effective vindication doctrine” to invalidate a class action waiver of claims brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”); and (ii) the FLSA does not include a “contrary congressional command” that would prohibit the enforcement of… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:28 pm
Updating this ILB entry from September 25th on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of John Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:01 am by Epstein Becker Green
Just prior to the rule going into effect, the DC Court of Appeals issued an emergency injunction in support of the District Court’s opinion and the NLRB opted to not enforce the rule pending the appeal. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:53 am by Kyle Persaud
If you disagree with a ruling at trial, you may ,,,appeal the verdict. [read post]