Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2013, 1:22 pm
NWF warned, "The risks of Keystone XL are huge; the reward is 35 permanent jobs in exchange for higher gas prices, oiled wildlife and communities, and another step towards climate calamity." [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
22 May 2013, 3:07 pm
A shell company is a company that exists but does not actually do any business or have any assets. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/XvCRw2QPKX -> Facebook status update (Part 1): The legal battle behind Facebook Timeline http://t.co/zsxbcBCkTl -> Facebook status update (Part 2): Does that domain name say http://t.co/jXHtAt1gLR? [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:38 am
Ross, 35 S.W.3d 924 (Tex. 2011), and BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
Distinctions Concerning the Target of Surveillance and/or His Interlocutors 1. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Id. at *35.That killed the negligent undertaking claim, whether under Pennsylvania or Texas law.The plaintiffs asserted fraud as a fallback.Again the publishers acted as publishers. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:06 am
Dog bite losses exceed $1 billion per year. [read post]
16 May 2013, 4:19 am
I question if the public will ever see any portion of the $16 billion amassed and stockpiled over the last 35 years (especially over the last 12 years); or if the MCCA Board will just meet, declare a surplus, and distribute the money amongst themselves. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am
Lumgair and James Harding Beech (Mar. 22, 2005), and isassigned to ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.As an AIA footnote:The America Invents Act states that the provisions of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:09 am
Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1562-63 (Fed.Cir. 1991).We sustain this rejection of claims 1-12.The appellants PREVAILED on their arguments about the 102 rejections, butbecause they lost on 112: DECISIONAs all claims remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:41 am
In the Answer, the Examiner explicitly withdrew therejection of claims 1, 7, and 13 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Salla, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2013 WL 1681220 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) [read post]
15 May 2013, 3:54 am
One of the most powerful of these is the new post-grant review (PGR) proceeding that allows patent challenges on any validity ground, including issues arising from 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:19 pm
The magistrate judge recommended denying defendant's motion for attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:47 am
The jury determined that“[c]laims 1 to 7 and 9 of [Metso’s] ’618 patent [we]re notinvalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:00 pm
Or am I a part of the FCPA Bar and Inc. which assists companies to comply with a now 35 year old law? [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:39 am
In addition, the presumption of validity under 35 U.S.C. 282 applies when Section 101 patent ineligibility is raised as an invalidity challenge. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
Such a sale, however, does not allow the purchaser to make new copies of the patented invention. [read post]
