Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 5701 - 5720 of 6,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm by Anna Christensen
  The Court did, however, find itself bound by the Florida Supreme Court’s holding that the Florida felony battery statute’s “actually and intentionally touching” requirement was satisfied by any intentional physical contact, “no matter how slight. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
However, assuming the statements were “testimonial,” Hervey went on to make the excellent point that if the statements were truly “background” evidence not offered for the truth of the matter asserted, then it didn’t matter how damning the details were because they did not violate the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:06 am by Kenneth Anderson
 But as a descriptive rather than normative matter, I think I detect in the move to embrace aggression as a justiciable crime at the ICC, an emerging pattern of seeking ways to “contract around” the Security Council. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:27 am by David Conway
’ Well, with an up-coming election in a matter of months if not weeks, we shall likely have an opportunity to see Carritt’s surmise being carried out in action. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:02 pm
Rather than conducting an investigation and suspending Johnson, he apparently sought to "silence" the matter. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:45 pm
It's possible, of course, that Paterson is completely blameless in the Johnson matter, but given that the Johnson story was the immediate impetus for Paterson's abandonment of his election plans, that seems unlikely. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm by Orin Kerr
No matter what label you apply, the question is the same: Does a cost/benefit balance justify applying the exclusionary rule to new legal developments on direct review? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:39 pm by Michael Glennon
In any event, all this is a matter of terminology, not substance. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:26 am by Larry Johnson
This brings me to another matter as a follow-up to Professor Glennon’s piece. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:39 am by Susan Brenner
Most of the cases seem to deal with jurors using technology – again, particularly the Internet – to conduct their own research into matters at issue in the case they’re going to decide. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:34 pm by charonqc
I have long felt that the fees for the LPC and BVC are ‘pacy’ – with BPP Law School heading the list – but this is essentially a matter of what the market will bear and regulators may have little appetite for getting involved. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:48 pm by Jeralyn
Johnson, but she complained in court that the State Police had been harassing her to drop the matter. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:58 am by Anna Christensen
On behalf of the federal government, Assistant to the Solicitor General Eric Miller opened by arguing that the Second Circuit had applied the incorrect standard under Rule 52(b) when it held that “reversal of [Marcus’s] conviction was appropriate on plain error review if there was any possibility, no matter how unlikely, that the jury’s verdict was based entirely on conduct predating the enactment of the statute. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:40 pm by info@allaboutbedsores.com
If you or a loved one has suffered from bedsores while under the treatment of a caregiver or care facility, this is a serious matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:13 pm by SOIssues
  They can create a new email address in a matter of minutes, and be on their way, if that is their intention. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:27 am by Mandelman
  And over 100 Mandelman Matters readers have already followed this link and  bought it on Amazon. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:24 pm by Don Cruse
Everyone knows the basic answers that too many issues mean you have too few pages for the ones that matter or that not being able to discard weak issues hurts your credibility as an advocate. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:45 pm by Anna Christensen
  In its view, the Ex Post Facto Clause is violated “whenever there is any possibility, no matter how unlikely, that the jury could have convicted based exclusively on pre-enactment conduct. [read post]
To that end, it’s important that the focus on “too big to fail” doesn’t ignore retail investors by thinking of them as “too small to matter. [read post]