Search for: "Jackson v. State" Results 5701 - 5720 of 6,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am by Erin Miller
City of Jackson (2005), which recognized claims of disparate impact under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 2:40 am by Sherica Celine
This practice note, by Damon Silver, Gregory Brown, Jr., and Cindy Huang, Jackson Lewis P.C., addresses potential legal and business risks stemming from the use of AI tools to make employment decisions and manage employee performance. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Stephen Masterson
Supreme Court has dismissed Moyle v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am by Wessen Jazrawi
XX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 742 (15 June 2012). [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:15 am by jonathanturley
Here is the column: In their historic ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:02 am by Eleonora Rosati
For example, Jackson Pollock did not know exactly where the paint thrown on canvas would fall, yet the authorship of his paintings is unquestionable. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:48 pm
 Then, in 2013, he spent half a year researching into the effects of the Jackson Review of Civil Litigation Costs on litigation on the PCC, seeking to ascertain whether the reforms achieved the key objectives. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
For the fairly obvious reason that in each case, the first certiorari question is whether the Court should overrule Grutter v. [read post]