Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 10:14 am
This post was written by Mark S. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 11:15 pm
In any case, the Board pointed out once again that "the determination of registrability of particular marks by the trademark examining attorneys cannot control the result in another case involving different marks. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
By Mark S. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:30 am
Blue Ivy alleges that, although BGK Trademark Holdings is claiming the use of the BLUE IVY CARTER mark for a wide range of goods and services, that there’s no true intent to use the mark in commerce at all. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:25 am
With Mark Lemley, Mark McKenna, and a number of other IP professors, I submitted this amicus brief arguing that the 10th Circuit should adopt Rogers v. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:26 am
Vineyards et al., Case No. 09-cv-02002 (D. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
COC’s applications in this case are based not on actual use in commerce, but on a bona fide intent to use the NATIONAL CHAMBER mark in connection with the Subject Services, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:13 am
I once heard a TTAB judge state that the outcomes of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:01 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 11:10 pm
I once heard a TTAB judge state that the outcome of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases may be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:11 am
I once heard a TTAB judge state that the outcome of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:32 am
Is this more of a case of reverse confusion, where the oil company is thought to be impinging on the trade association mark? [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
Supposedly one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:47 am
I once heard a TTAB judge say that the outcome of nearly all Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:22 am
A TTAB judge once told me that in 95% of Section 2(d) cases, one can predict the outcome just from looking at the marks and the involved goods/services. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:15 am
Cooper case. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:50 am
By just randomly guessing two of the four cases, you have a one-in-six change of being correct.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:21 am
It's been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:25 am
With his previous focus on trade mark law, copyright, and design rights, Jan is always looking for interesting cases and new developments in the field. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:40 am
I once heard a TTAB judge assert that the outcome of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases may be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
