Search for: "STATE v KEYS"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 19,992
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Many state and local governments impose ad valorem property taxes on tangible personal property (TPP) in addition to property taxes applied to land and structures. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 10:49 am
Johnson v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 8:57 am
In Griffin v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:32 pm
Frazzini v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
That's why cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:43 am
Supreme Court decision in Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
Cottrill v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:13 am
Evid. 403; United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 3:31 am
That ruling was handed down in Conte v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 9:41 am
Huawei v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
The case in question, FTC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
But it accepted that the State (here Italy) believed that the crucifix was a symbol with multiple meanings, some of which were foundational as to its civic traditions, and…and here is the key…"the decision whether or not to perpetuate a tradition falls in principle within the margin of appreciation of the respondent State. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:03 am
Lempert v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Ford v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:23 am
Citing Braxton v Mendelson, 233 NY 122, the court said that a number of elements may be helpful in attempting to decide the question. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as plaintiffs elected to accept the settlement without asserting their current claim that they were entitled to an additional amount representing the architectural and engineering fees, the settlement gave rise to an accord and satisfaction (see Gimper, Inc. v Giacchetta, 221 AD2d 682, 684 [1995]; Hemingway v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
WSJ Law Blog notes “another odd twist in an already odd case”: Georgia prosecutors cannot schedule Davis’s execution “because federal regulators have seized the state’s entire supply of a key lethal injection drug”; the Associated Press also has coverage of the story. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
The leading case in the UK post pregabalin is Eli Lilly v Genentech [2019] EWHC 387, where Arnold J also found that the plausibility threshold was not met.The key take home message is that plausibility is alive and well in the UK. [read post]
