Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2013, 2:52 pm
Cir. 2010), in which this court construed “‘the centrifugal unit’” to be the entire unit. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:35 pm
Tomack, was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
Google is headquartered in California. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:19 am
Harris v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
But "[t]he condition of Indians in relation to the United States is perhaps unlike that of any two people in existence … marked by peculiar and cardinal distinctions that exist nowhere else," Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
CalPERS explained that the recent federal district court decision (State of California v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
We can also consider more contemporary lower court decisions adjudicating challenges to laws discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.One important theme running through this precedent employs a recurring set of criteria (tracing back to the famous Footnote 4 of the United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:17 pm
The next Apple v. [read post]
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
This issue is dealt with in Park Place Estates v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 10:49 pm
"Pursuant to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Hubbart v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
California and the companion case of US v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 2:02 pm
(SeaWorld) in the Northern District of California, styled Marc Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:58 am
The second case, United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:12 pm
When Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Other previews come from Jess Bravin and Douglas Belkin in The Wall Street Journal and Vinay Harpalani at ISCOTUSnow, while in the San Jose Mercury News Howard Mintz discusses what the case might mean for California’s Proposition 209, that state’s seventeen-year-old ban on affirmative action. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:07 pm
The California Supreme court previously addressed the tension between right of publicity and the First Amendment in Comedy Three Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 3:58 pm
The court ruled that Unum, a Fortune 500 company and the largest group and individual disability carrier in the United States, abused its discretion in terminating Mondolo’s disability benefits. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:33 pm
See Roper v. [read post]
