Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 12,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 9:47 am
From the court’s opinion, Tyler v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
A closely watched case, Garcia v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 3:25 am
The Court this week passed up a chance to do that. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
” In Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
” And Sahil Kapur of Talking Points Memo reports that “the Republicans who will run Congress next year may be unintentionally undermining their chances of a victory in King v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Interesting statistic: a litigant has a 1% or less chance of convincing the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:56 pm
State Florida Judge Disqualified Over Facebook Friendship With Prosecutor -– Domville v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 11:02 am
In Searight v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:40 am
Why not give people a real chance at justice, when the stakes are so high? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Beyond the case itself, Darren seizes the chance to provide a lovely comparative piece upon how product-by-process works in the UK, in the US and in Eponia.* Google announces end of News in SpainA few weeks ago, Spain introduced an ancillary right over news content. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:49 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in State Water Contractors v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Burnett in its December 11, 2014 decision in Matter of Noella Lum B. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 7:16 am
Anyway, this is what Thomas tells us about a larger than life dispute that is rumbling through the courts in the US but which many readers from outside that jurisdiction may not yet have had the chance to reflect upon:It is difficult for even the most soundly-sleeping feline to remain unconscious of the recent Google petition for writ of certiorari. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
Code § 1252.102, and the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
” First, the statute clearly sets forth both the type of conduct and the mindset an employer must have to be found liable for punitive damages, dramatically reducing the chance of random or arbitrary awards. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:13 am
[He] was then given another chance to review Resume–Now's terms of use and privacy policy. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
This fact would seem relevant and Justice Breyer was concerned that the Eleventh Circuit did not give the state a chance to justify its facial discrimination. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:44 am
The basis for this was most recently stated in Owenby v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:19 pm
The case is called Nowrouzi et. al. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
And here’s one application of the law, from Thomas v. [read post]
