Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 61,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 8:00 pm
In a recent United States Supreme Court case (Bullcoming v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:56 am
In Pignoloni v Gallagher, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 5904440 (E.D.N.Y.), Petitioner Fabrizio Pignoloni ("Petitioner") filed a petition under the Hague Convention seeking an order directing Respondent Luise Ann Gallagher ("Respondent") to return their two minor sons, E.G.P. and A.T.P. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:41 pm
Yesterday, in State Farm v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 3:33 am
The court, in affirming the judgment of a district court in Vermont, relied largely on the plain meaning of the visual arts statute to find that the obscuring of the two murals did not equate to their unauthorized “destruction” or “modification” (Kerson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Comer (2017); Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:46 am
The status report presents Judge Tanya Chutkan with a stark choice about the meaning of Trump v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
The trial court also found: “Wife is an interested party acting in good faith with insufficient means to defray costs and expenses of suit and is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:05 am
The opinion in Maples v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am
Biden again does not define what he means by assault weapons. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:57 am
But in any case it is an inapt analogy to the issue presented in King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:33 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
Sanofi v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm
United States, 10-6549, relisted 1/7, 1/14; and Howes v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:32 am
In Town of Boxford v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:32 am
In Town of Boxford v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:32 am
In Town of Boxford v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:48 am
(So far as I know, Human Rights Campaign has never attempted to trademark the equality sign and/or to challenge Against Equality’s use of a similarly configured—but very different meaning—greater-than symbol.) [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens, born or naturalized, under the stipulations of this Convention. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 6:00 am
California State Lottery (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1198, 1203-1204; Janis v. [read post]
