Search for: "Thomas View" Results 5701 - 5720 of 12,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 1:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Justice Scalia announces his dissent, joined by Thomas, from the bench. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm by Rich McHugh
Justice Thomas maintained his by now time-honored tradition of not asking any questions during the oral argument (those same pundits fairly unanimously predict Thomas will vote to strike down the individual mandate). [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 10:11 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Ct. 1720, 1720 (2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (noting that Janus "casts significant doubt" on Keller). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
Yet Justice Scalia apparently stands alone in these views. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
Thomas indicated that he would have granted Missouri’s request, but he too did not provide any explanation for his decision. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Barry Barnett
Perfection becomes the enemy of the good, in their view. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:59 pm by Lyle Roberts
” In a vigorous dissent, Justice Thomas (joined by Justice Gorsuch)), argued that the majority decision “eviscerates” the Janus distinction between primary and secondary liability. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 3:08 am by Lauren Kuley and Benjamin Beaton
” In his view, and Justice Thomas’, this should have permitted some (though not all) of the Tennessee regulations at issue. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:33 am by Thomas Econometrics
You can view our Privacy Policy information here. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:29 am by Adam Wagner
The House of Commons has asserted a disciplinary jurisdiction over expenses claims and has set up a review of such claims under Sir Thomas Legg. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:04 am by Steve Vladeck
Although the ruling is not likely to stand as one of the term’s more significant decisions, the opposite result—for which Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito argued in dissent—could have had sweeping ramifications. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
 Even in the darkness of four justices who repeatedly pen and join opinions that take dangerously crabbed views of the Constitution's guarantees of individual liberties -- Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito -- even those four sometimes get it right, but not always as a unified team. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am by Will Baude
Echoing the Rehnquist-Scalia-Thomas concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 3:08 am by Lauren Kuley and Benjamin Beaton
” In his view, and Justice Thomas’, this should have permitted some (though not all) of the Tennessee regulations at issue. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:14 pm by BDG
  Similarly, the Court seems to lean more and more towards Justice Thomas' view that courts should not enforce the "dormant" commerce clause, and should leave protection of the national open market to Congress, apparently on the assumption that Congress would do a better job. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  The arguments suggest that the Roberts Court may continue down its path mimicking the Supreme Court of one hundred years ago--sticking to an outdated and distorted view of the Constitution framed by a radical right majority on the Court (comprised of Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Scalia and often Kennedy) and unsuited to the real challenges that our society faces today. [read post]