Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 5721 - 5740 of 32,308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The opinion does not disclose who prepared the returns. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:23 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
EPA’s April 8, 2022, letter indicates that OEHHA’s modifications to the warning language would be approvable as language that EPA does not consider to be false and misleading should a registrant propose it. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 12:35 am
"Using his system, the national champion would not have changed, but the rankings of teams below Nr. 1 would have changed, in part, substantially:MinV ranking (Actual Massey Consensus Ranking in Parentheses)Year...Number 1...........Number 2............Number 3...........Number 4..........Number 51994...Nebraska (1)......Penn State (2)......Colorado (3).......Alabama (5).......Texas A&M (8)1995...Nebraska (1)......Florida (2)...........Tennessee… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Great American Insurance Co., 2010 WL 2723195, at *1-2 (S.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:40 pm by Unknown
Therefore, the measure provides for a significant lower level of taxation and deserves an assessment under the Code.Criterion 1 – Targeting non-residents: The law adopted on 4 September 2018 does not distinguish between transactions with resident and non-resident in order for the tax reduction to be granted. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Stu Ellis
USDA usually does a fair job of counting acres and ears on a stalk. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:28 pm by Jacobs Paul
   (f) For all provisions of this code except those for which a civilpenalty is specifically provided, there is established a civilpenalty for a violation of these provisions, as follows:   (1) If, at the time of the alleged violation, the person does notemploy one or more employees, the civil penalty is five hundreddollars ($500). [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Moreover, a sponsor who qualifies for the FEIE at the time of filing the I-864 may not even be considered domiciled in the US for purposes of the I-864 under 8 CFR 213a.2(c)(1)(ii), which requires that their principal place of residence be in the U.S. [read post]