Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 6,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2010, 6:53 pm
While the attributes identified by SCJ were relevant to the inquiry and might weaken the case for deceptiveness, they did not allow a ruling on the issue as a matter of law.Guidelines issued by the Federal Trade Commission provided that a product label containing an “environmental seal,” such as a globe icon with the text “Earth Smart” around it, “is likely to convey to consumers that the product is environmentally superior to other products” and would be… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
Per Curiam Opinion(Justice Guzman not sitting) [she wrote the opinion in the court of appeals below]In the Matter of R.D., No. 09-0343 (Tex. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
by Charles Green in Trusted Matters Many readers are familiar with Goethe’s Faust in which the protagonist sells his soul to the devil in return for having his way here on earth. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Buckman bars fraud on the FDA claims, no matter what their purported statutory basis. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:37 am
But not according to Simon Johnson, who writes that "What we have now... [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
Didn’t matter. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:25 am
Turning to the question of plaintiff’s “exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance,” the next element of the administrative exemption, the court found that her testimony showed she executed “nearly all of her duties without direct oversight. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
Balfour’s poodle.[2] David Lloyd George The most troubling countermajoritarian difficulty in modern constitutional law is Rule Twenty-Two of the United States Senate.[3] Forty-one Senators, who may represent less than forty-one percent of the population due to the malapportionment of the Senate, can veto most legislation and presidential nominations by refusing to invoke “cloture” and thereby allow debate on those matters to end.[4] Though the filibuster is woven into… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:53 pm
I do vote Labour and I am more than prepared to be critical of this sort of nonsense by a Labour MP – but does it really matter? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm
What will the judge do if they have a hearing on the matter? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm
What will the judge do if they have a hearing on the matter? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:13 am
Throughout the program, you will work with subject matter experts as well as colleagues from across the nation. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
“When the matter in issue concerns only a few seconds or minutes of work beyond the scheduled working hours, such trifles may be disregarded. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 6:58 pm
"You called it when you said you thought this happened over her invention," and referring to this bloggers first post on this matter,"When her tenure was denied, that invention became the intellectual property of the university. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Johnson, Justice Debra L. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
Posner's website speaks of the matter in the following way:Last Friday [5 Feb 2010], Jack Shafer in Slate ran an article pinpointing five sentences from one of my stories in The Daily Beast, which I admitted met the definition of plagiarism and I accepted full responsibility for that error, an incident I called “accidental plagiarism. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
What does matter is how he conducts himself as a judge, and his ability to put his own views and background aside and focus on the law and the constitution. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:58 am
This means that an effort to prevent the witnesses from testifying about their pretrial identifications (or for that matter to prevent witnesses from directly identifying a person in court) was a "motion to suppress". [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
The defendants moved to dismiss for lack of standing and for failure to state a claim as a matter of law. [read post]
