Search for: "Key v. State"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 20,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:13 am
Evid. 403; United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:52 am
On June 21, the Fourth Circuit will hear North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:23 am
Citing Braxton v Mendelson, 233 NY 122, the court said that a number of elements may be helpful in attempting to decide the question. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Patrick Huston, which “organizes, analyzes and synthesizes all of the 48 UTSA-adopting states’ published court opinions (state and federal). [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
The case in question, FTC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 3:31 am
That ruling was handed down in Conte v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
That's why cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
WSJ Law Blog notes “another odd twist in an already odd case”: Georgia prosecutors cannot schedule Davis’s execution “because federal regulators have seized the state’s entire supply of a key lethal injection drug”; the Associated Press also has coverage of the story. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:08 am
Now what about Texas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:09 pm
That is what happened in Promega Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as plaintiffs elected to accept the settlement without asserting their current claim that they were entitled to an additional amount representing the architectural and engineering fees, the settlement gave rise to an accord and satisfaction (see Gimper, Inc. v Giacchetta, 221 AD2d 682, 684 [1995]; Hemingway v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:21 am
The key issue in the license plate case (Walker v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
Key Statutes and Precedent Chapter 3314 (establishes community schools and sets forth entire statutory framework for their operation) Cordray v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 11:52 am
Under these terms, “hostage diplomacy” becomes a mode of communication for these states. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 11:52 am
Under these terms, “hostage diplomacy” becomes a mode of communication for these states. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
If the FDA has already reviewed the risk at issue and has approved labeling that deals with it, state law cannot deem inadequate the labeling that the FDA approved.The key here is something we first posted about over a year ago, and that's the clear regulatory history that limits to new information the "changes being effected" ("CBE") exception to FDA pre-approval. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
