Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 16,888
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2018, 10:56 am
Though the question presented was quite narrow and technical, the split in Artis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:11 am
In Kim v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” Commentary comes from NFIB, which calls it “a good day for small business. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
On the small tract of land that remains of Britain’s colony of Cyprus, six families of refugees are housed. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm
North Dakota, “that a State may not require out-of-state sellers of goods or services to collect that State’s sales/use tax, unless the out-of-state seller has some ‘physical presence’ in the State – a retail outlet, warehouse, office, or the like” This term’s case of South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
Moreover, the Oil and Gas Companies argued that there was no need to recognize a new, state-wide implied covenant because the covenant of reasonable development provides sufficient protection for landowners. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
Moreover, the Oil and Gas Companies argued that there was no need to recognize a new, state-wide implied covenant because the covenant of reasonable development provides sufficient protection for landowners. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:02 pm
PNC Bank and Strang v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
In a sea of reports on the state of the (large firm) legal industry, it’s nice to see recognition of their particular issues in Thomson Reuters’ State of US Small Law Firms Survey. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:17 am
In People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:17 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Password protection and encryption can limit access to digital information to a small set of users. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Last week, the Court granted cert in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
Legal Basis The WPR letter’s stated legal authorities for the armed conflict against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, associated forces, and, since August 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS), are the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMF), the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power, and his “constitutional and statutory authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The panel began with a discussion of Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
Consider, for instance, Darshan-Leitner’s most prominent (if temporary) legal victory: Sokolow v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Last week, the Court granted cert in South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
United States, a case that was argued last month in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction charges, is “important to all taxpayers, but particularly small businesses, which tend to file more complicated tax returns and have more paperwork associated with them. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
I don’t have a clear vision of which group will prevail or how the SESTA v. [read post]
