Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 5721 - 5740 of 25,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Living Gardens, Living Art, and Living Tradition, (5 IP Theory Journal 73 (2015)).Mark Walters, Succession to the Throne and the Architecture of the Constitution of Canada, (Queen's University Legal Research Paper No. 2015-001 (2014)).Lorenzo Zucca, A Secular Manifesto for Europe, (March 5, 2015).Anuradha Chadha, A Case for Reservation in Favour of Religious Minorities,(March 6, 2015).Mariano Croce,… [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:09 am
Bailey and Middleton reportedly both stated that Bailey lived at the basement apartment property. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:23 am by D. Todd Smith
We expect a lively and informative discussion and exchange of ideas from both sides of the bench. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:23 am by D. Todd Smith
We expect a lively and informative discussion and exchange of ideas from both sides of the bench. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
Spisak Jr. should live or die, a lawyer told them this: "Ladies and gentlemen, when you turn and look at Frank Spisak, don't look for good deeds, because he has done none. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by anbrandon
According to Ray, the officers threatened to arrest Ray's live-in girlfriend --- the mother of his 14-year-old son --- and make his child a ward of the state if he did not talk to them. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
The State sold the land occupied by the community to a private investor in 2006 and the Courts ordered the community's expulsion on the grounds that they had no proprietary interest in the land, despite the time they had already lived there with the State's acquiescence. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
The State sold the land occupied by the community to a private investor in 2006 and the Courts ordered the community's expulsion on the grounds that they had no proprietary interest in the land, despite the time they had already lived there with the State's acquiescence. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining “continuous residency” for the purpose of qualifying for public office or employmentGlickman v Laffin, 2016 NY Slip Op 05842, Court of AppealsCandidates seeking election to the New York State Senate must meet the five-year New York State residency requirement and the one-year Senate District residency requirement as set out in Article III, §7 of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:54 am
Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130, 654 N.Y.S.2d 27; Merola v Merola, supra; Kilmer v Kilmer, supra; Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra ). [read post]