Search for: "State v. Richard" Results 5721 - 5740 of 8,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck has been assisting with research and strategic planning in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
Acuff-Rose case, where the court explained that the more an unauthorized derivative work is transformative, the more likely such use is fair under §107 of the Copyright Act (p. 13).Transformative works can be mash-ups, remixes, fan-fiction, fan-made videos, or can also be works of visual arts which incorporate elements of previous works, such as Richard Prince’s CanalZone series which led in the U.S. to the much debated Cariou v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
On 17 and 18 October 2023, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Hodge, Hamblen, Leggatt, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States District Court for the District of Columbia.The Cheney litigation began when various public interest groups sued Vice President Richard Cheney and the National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG) that President George W. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:04 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
  They argued the court should follow a 2013 decision from Texas, Rachal v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
” It also states that “Category of the not a plugged nickle [sic] means get nothing… . [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am by Simon Fodden
McDonald Technology in Litigation: Friend or Foe by Simon V. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
  After all, Michael Wayne Richard needed killing. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:20 am by WSLL
Richard of The Richard Law Firm, Jackson, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Defendants): William H. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:33 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
One reason the appointments have generated so much attention stems from New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]