Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 5721 - 5740 of 51,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2022, 9:04 am by Josh Blackman
Here is the abstract: The current debates over Roe v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:40 am by Simon Gollish
  [1] For more in-depth analysis of the OPR, please see the following blog post published by our colleagues in the US: https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/cf81d46e/rare-us-fcpa-advisory-opinion-sheds-light-on-duress-payments. [2] CFPOA. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-45.2/. [3] CFPOA, at s 3(1). [4] See the summary of Bill S-21, An Act respecting the corruption of foreign public officials and the implementation of the Convention on… [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am by George Croner
The Robust Use of FISA Section 702 Continues One surveillance authority that has not seen the reductions reflected in FISA Title I (electronic surveillance), Title III (physical search) and Title V (business records and tangible things) applications is the collection activity conducted under the authority of FISA § 702. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am by George Croner
The Robust Use of FISA Section 702 Continues One surveillance authority that has not seen the reductions reflected in FISA Title I (electronic surveillance), Title III (physical search) and Title V (business records and tangible things) applications is the collection activity conducted under the authority of FISA § 702. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:00 am by Chloe Reichel
I think that the organizing that’s around this issue has given us a Court that thinks there is no abortion right, full stop, on any grounds, including ones not originally dealt with in the Roe opinion. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Fixed original public meaning can give rise to different outcomes given changing beliefs about facts. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I’ve given it hundreds of times.But I don’t anymore. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:56 am by Ananya Mukherjee
Similarly in Prosecutor v Milan Martic, the ICTY held that any ensuing harm to civilian objects, such as the environment, cannot be justified in the “absence of closeness” between such objects and the legitimate military target. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]