Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10" Results 5741 - 5760 of 9,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 1:14 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
  The facts of the case were egregious:  The Plaintiff’s late husband, John K. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1 (1966), factors still control an obviousness inquiry. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Emory generates $1 billion in revenues and has 8400 employees. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, even if a law school does want to say that one side is correct—again, something I'd recommend against, for reasons given in the University of Chicago's Kalven Report[1]—it can do so, while still stressing that it's important for people to hear both sides: Come hear John Peters and Jane Williams debate immigration policy! [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:16 pm
They claimed that they misunderstood the requirements of Section 1(a), did not understand the legal meaning of "use in commerce," and "honestly believed that their ownership of the same mark in Australia and their use in commerce of such mark in Australia justified their Section 1(a) filing in the U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:23 am
Defendants John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company who are sued herein under fictitious names because their true names and capacities are unknown at this time. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
Luther) Business Use of Intellectual Property Protection Documented in NSF Survey (PDF) – 1.usa.gov/xVAFhv (John Jankowski) Law Review Circulation 2011: More Change, More Same – bit.ly/yX7p0c (Ross Davies) Statistics for eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/y4DCOK (@OrangeLT) The Idea of ‘Too Much Law’ | Fordham Law Review - bit.ly/y6KSSF (Mila Sohoni) Sight and Sound Delaware’s Default Standard For Discovery Including Discovery of ESI… [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
I will largely leave to others prescriptions about what is to be done; but I hope my analysis might help us think through such matters. [1] See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by David Post
Article II, Section 1, as modified by the 12th Amendment in 1804, lays out the basic scheme. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Although the affidavits by the unnamed Clients 1-5, who remained plaintiff’s clients, do not alone support the tortious interference claim, they shed light on the tactics to which defendants were apparently willing to resort, as does the affidavit by the Schwitzer firm’s former employee, which is consistent with those by Clients 1-5. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:14 pm
According to the Utah Senate Majority Whip, Republican Dan Eastman of Bountiful, "[y]ou put 1 800 Contacts into Google and you get 47 different contact lens makers. [read post]