Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 6,812
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 1:11 pm
The details don't really matter here.What got me rolling on this, are Rand Paul's comments on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Volokh Conspirator David Bernstein's response/attack to "Bruce Bartlett's Attack on Libertarianism," and David Rittger's piece at the Cato@Liberty blog warning that US v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm
The entire exercise is an effort to gin up, in the apt words of Kelly Cobb at Americans for Tax Reform, a “phony wireless crisis” to serve as a basis for a sweeping regulatory agenda for broadband and the Internet that, to succeed in the wake of Comcast v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:24 am
I think the better analysis of the Thirteenth Amendment was explained by Justice Harlan in his dissenting opinions in the Civil Rights Cases and Plessy v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:45 am
(Or, to use a metaphor from my alternate finance professor life, ICL is in the business of rolling over the expectations – the expectations keep getting described as short term, and so it issues short term commercial paper, as it were, that on its face promises that ICL will do these many wonderful things, but as they don’t occur on schedule, it has to keep rolling them over and over and over.) [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:20 pm
See also, Harris v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:05 pm
Published CCA case: Flores v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:00 am
; (iv) documenting the availability, if any, of earnbacks; and (v) specifying any concomitant rights of termination available to the customer. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:04 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:52 am
In Maxwell v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:59 am
Adams & Assoc., LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:45 pm
Breaking my silence however, I've just blogged over at the ORG-blog on Welcome to the Former Big Brother House - considering the new programme of rolling back the surveillance state and bolstering civil liberties in the Lib/Con coalition document; and wondering what more concessions to better privacy we might get in the ongoing process of reforming the Data Protection Directive, where a first draft proposal is expected by end 2010. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:36 pm
Council v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:53 pm
District Attorney Harris has called on John Keker, a top criminal defense attorney, chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:12 pm
Records showed that one high-rolling gambler wagered more than $2 million in a two-month period. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:16 am
Vem kan han lita på, och vilken roll har han i maktspelet som pågår i företagets ledning? [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:28 pm
But don’t take my word for it, as this is what federal judge Frederick Scullin, Jr. said about it in Alexander v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:37 pm
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10004 Related posts:Online Privacy v. [read post]
