Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 22,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
He had not satisfied the burden of demonstrating that he had publicly repudiated the views which had brought him within the policy. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Last year, in Smith v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 12:41 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:20 am
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:30 pm
Baugh v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:29 am
In Rba Edipresse, S.L. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 4:14 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
HIGGINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria division) recently addressed this rule in Western Industries-North, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:18 am
Petersburg, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:09 pm
The OCR further stated that it would not penalize covered health care providers for the lack of a business associate agreement with video communication vendors. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 12:54 pm
Additional Resources: Kumar v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:30 am
Manson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:26 pm
A July 2015 appellate court decision, State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which come within… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which come within… [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Exhausting administrative remediesRoss v Blake, USSC, Docket No. 15-339This decision by the United States Supreme Court considered an appeal involving the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act [PLRA], 42 USC 1997e(a) requirement that an inmate exhaust “such administrative remedies as are available” before bringing suit. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
Defendant's statement is insufficient in and of itself to sustain the burden of showing prejudice. [read post]
