Search for: "State v. Jackson" Results 5741 - 5760 of 6,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
In his State of the Union address, President Biden praised Judge Jackson as one of the “top legal minds” and a “consensus builder. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies  illegally process their personal information. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:16 am by Eric Claeys
Jackson Women's Health Center is currently before the Supreme Court, and the litigants in Dobbs believe that the case presents the question whether Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Dissent: The $500 limit is not too low, and the $3k limit is no different from the prohibition on foreign contributions upheld in Bluman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
Its formal first reading was on 26 May 2010 and its second reading on 9 July 2010: In response to the Bill, the new Government stated a commitment to bring forward its own proposals. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am by David Post
Jackson (2021) (majority opinion) No one contends that pre-enforcement review should be available whenever a state law chills the exercise of a constitutional right. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am by Jeanine Cali
Benjamin Curtis – in his capacity as an attorney in Boston – argued in the 1836 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
The discussion draft overturns the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. [read post]