Search for: "State v. State"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 258,441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2016, 1:29 pm
24 Jun 2019, 10:00 pm
The CAFC also adopted reasoning by the Supreme Court in Oil States Energy Servs, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Next term, the justices will consider Espinoza v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
It is posted on the Internet at http://www.jcope.ny.gov/advice/ethc/98-12.htmIn Pagan v Commissioner of Labor, 53 AD3d 964, the Appellate Division addressed the disqualification of an applicant for unemployment insurance benefits following his termination for accepting a designation to run as a candidate for the State Assembly, ruling that his employment was terminated due to misconduct. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:53 pm
District Court for the Southern District of California recently addressed the issue in Azar v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:09 pm
In support of the petition in Gamble v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:09 pm
In support of the petition in Gamble v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:39 am
Law Lessons from State of NEW JERSEY, Department of Treasury, Division of Investment, o/b/o Common Pension Fund A v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
(Keeton v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:18 am
Federal preemption of state medical fee schedules and regulations are a prevailing challenge to the patchwork of non-uniform state benefit programs.EagleMed, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:01 pm
Today, in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:32 pm
In this context, CAAF’s 3-2 decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 12:15 am
Secretary of State for Defence. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:54 pm
Clingenpeel v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
The State applied to or Courts of that State shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character or not. [read post]
