Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 5741 - 5760 of 7,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2007, 4:06 am by Imke Ratschko
  If the IP is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, you may have to record a transfer ("assignment") to the new owner. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:09 am
Rouse was admitted to the Oklahoma Bar in 1990 and became registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1992. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:28 pm by Laura Orr
It focuses on the three main forms of US federal intellectual property—trademark, copyright and patent—but many of the ideas discussed here apply far beyond those legal areas and far beyond the law of the United States…. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:11 am by Douglas Sorocco
Rouse was admitted to the Oklahoma Bar in 1990 and became registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1992. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:41 am by Elizabeth Golluscio
ARIPO is governed by the Harare Protocol for patents, utility models and industrial designs and the Banjul Protocol for trademarks. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:47 am by Matt Osenga
The PTO has issued a press release regarding the possible government shut down at midnight tonight: In the event of a government shutdown on April 9, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will remain open and continue to operate as usual for a period of six business days – through Monday, April 18, 2011 — because the USPTO has enough available reserves, not linked to the current fiscal year, to remain in operation until then. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:45 am by SCOTUSblog
Elster, the court holds that the Patent and Trademark Office did not violate Steve Elster’s First Amendment right when it refused to register the “Trump too small” mark. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:57 am by Cari Rincker
The discussion will include the following: (1) Overview of intellectual property regulation in the United States and a history of its development; (2) Comparative analysis with European Union regulation of intellectual property; (3) International treaties regarding intellectual property; (4) Overview of copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret law; (5) Agriculture biotechnology issues; (6) Infringement cases, including saving seed litigation. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rigorous examination as in patent? [read post]
 Finally, patents are the only protection which must be registered through the United States Patent and Trademark Office to be valid and are used to protect technical advancements or inventions. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
It also parallels and differs from other types of intellectual property—patent, copyright, and trademark—litigation. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP tango)   Switzerland Further step to Swiss Federal Patent Court (EPLAW)   United Kingdom Reminder: an appeal is not a re-hearing: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (PatLit) Stretching copyright with contract: Global Coal Ltd v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46)   Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog)   Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group… [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:25 am
Michael Thesen (PatLit) writes on a recent German ruling on grounds for revocation of a patent under Article 138 of the European Patent Convention (where subject matter extends beyond the patent as applied for): are the are the conditions for revocation sufficient, or merely necessary? [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:32 am by Michael Geist
The strongest opposition came in the patents, enforcement, trademarks, and copyright sections. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Praxair”) appeals from theinter partes review decision of the United States Patentand Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board(“the Board”) holding claim 9 of U.S. [read post]